Skip to content

Irschik and ors. v. Austria

  • by

Irschik and ors. v. Austria

Court/Judicial Body:
Human Rights Committee

Communication No. 990/2001

19 March 2004

Instruments Cited:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
Art. 26: Non-discrimination

Mr. Irschik complained on his behalf, and on that of his two sons, that his article 26 rights under the ICCPR had been violated. The complaint arose out of a decision of the Austrian Constitutional Court, which had found a tax law to be unconstitutional, but delayed the enforcement of its decision to give the State time to legislate in place of the impugned law. Mr. Irschik complained that the people who were parties to the case before the Constitutional Court had been exempt from the general delay on the implementation of decision, and that this was a form of discrimination. Mr. Irschik had already submitted his case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), which had considered his complaint “manifestly ill-founded”. It was not until the complaint to the Human Rights Committee that the rights of Mr. Irschik’s sons were raised.

The Human Rights Committee considered the complaint inadmissible on two grounds. First, the fact that the ECHR had considered the case meant that the Human Rights Committee would not do so. Second, and of particular importance to the rights of the two children, the Committee would not consider a complaint arising in relation to persons that had not been raised in the previous domestic case. Since the rights of the children had not been specifically addressed at the national level, they could not be raised before the Committee.

Link to Full Judgement:

This case summary is provided by the Child Rights International network for educational and informational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice.

Related CRC Articles:
Cited CRC Articles: